RAG vs Fine-Tuning: Choosing the Right LLM Approach for Your Product
Both RAG and fine-tuning improve LLM performance on your specific use case — but they solve different problems. Here's how to choose.
User research, wireframes, design systems, and AI UX patterns
THE CHALLENGE
OUR APPROACH
We run structured design sprints — user research, information architecture, wireframes, hi-fi prototype, and a Figma component library engineers can implement without handholding. AI interfaces designed as first-class UX, not an afterthought.
What you receive
OUTCOMES
Engineering sprint starts without UX ambiguity
Consistent, professional interface across all product screens
AI interactions designed for clarity — users understand what the AI can and cannot do
Design system reduces future feature design time significantly
Validated prototype tested with real users before a line of code is written
OUR DIFFERENCE
We design AI interfaces — streaming states, uncertainty, citations — as first-class UX. Not a button and a text field.
Design systems with tokens, usage guidelines, and component specs that engineers can build from without constant questions.
We've designed products for FinTech, HealthTech, eCommerce, and Industrial clients across four markets.
HOW IT WORKS
Stakeholder interviews, user journey mapping, competitive analysis, and key problem framing.
Navigation structure, content hierarchy, and user flow diagrams.
Low-fidelity wireframes for all key user journeys, reviewed with stakeholders.
Brand-aligned high-fidelity designs with interactions, states, and edge cases.
Component library, design tokens, usage guidelines, and engineer handover session.
Best suited for
Not the right fit for
Engineering Stack
38 production-grade technologies — every one battle-tested in shipped products.
INVESTMENT
Get a detailed proposal within 48 hours. No commitment required.
Didn't find what you were searching for? Reach out to us at [email protected] and we'll assist you promptly.
A design system includes color tokens, typography scale, spacing system, component library (buttons, inputs, cards, navigation, etc.), usage guidelines, and handover documentation. Engineers can build without asking design questions for every component.
AI interfaces have unique challenges — streaming states, error handling, uncertainty communication, source attribution, and feedback collection. We design AI UX as first-class interactions, not standard form-and-button patterns.
Yes. We run usability testing sessions with real users using prototype validation tools. Testing happens before engineering starts — finding and fixing UX problems in Figma costs 10x less than fixing them in code.
FROM OUR CLIENTS
The team took our AI concept from whiteboard to production in 10 weeks. The architecture they designed handles 10x our expected load with no issues.
Insights
A collection of detailed case studies showcasing our design process, problem-solving approach,and the impact of our user-focused solutions.
ALSO IN MOBILE & WEB PLATFORMS
Swift, SwiftUI, and AI-powered iOS apps built for the App Store
Learn moreKotlin, Jetpack Compose, and AI-integrated Android apps for the Play Store
Learn moreiOS and Android from one codebase — without sacrificing performance
Learn moreNext.js web applications that score 95+ on Lighthouse
Learn moreInstallable, offline-capable web apps with native-like experience
Learn moreGlobal Presence
Our engineering team is based in New Delhi. We work with clients across India, USA, UK, and UAE — async-first, with structured weekly delivery sessions in your time zone.
India
New Delhi
14:29
IST (UTC+5:30)
Our expertise
United States
New York · Austin
04:59
EST / PST
We serve
UK
London · Manchester
09:59
GMT / BST
We serve
UAE
Dubai · Abu Dhabi
12:59
GST (UTC+4)
We serve
Clocks update live · Business hours Mon–Fri 09:00–18:00 local time
READY TO START?